Physical
Illusion
I am told by those who think they know,
that my experience of this physical world is illusion
because it is not the real world contained in
my mind,
but only my sensory impressions of the real world
which are represented in my mind ;
and hence my "inner mind" is the only "reality"
that I can ever know.
But if the only content of my mind is in my mind;
and my only experience of this physical world
is through my senses; and all this experience
is illusion,
then which, pray tell, is the real illusion?
If "spiritual" or "religious" experience is experience
in the "inner mind" how am I to distinguish between
the
inner illusion and the outer illusion? This is
only possible
if I mistrust my senses. But if I must mistrust
my senses,
How am I to trust my mistrust?
It requires no profound satori to know that
I am a presently existing organism of body and
brain
and that my "mind" is the present actifvity of
my brain.
The cortex of my brain is presently conscious
of the present input of my senses . This is a
single observation,
like a reflection in a mirror; and what appears
to be
multiple reflections are only reflections of reflections,
and not "other planes of existence".
Is a reflection "real"? Reality is that which points
only to itself,
and has no "meaning" other than itself.
A reflection of a reflection can only to point
to itself,
and to impute "meaning" beyond the original object
reflected
is absurd on its face.
The only "real" experience is direct observation
by the senses
of ojbects which point to nothing but themselves,
and devoid of mind-imposed abstract values.
My body, my physical organism , is an object that
can be directly observed.
My mind, the activity of my brain, is not an object
and cannot be directly observed.
Does my mind really exist? Of course it exists.
It is an ongoing series of events called thoughts.
Can it be "pointed to"? Can events be "pointed
to"?
Does one "point" to the thought , which is the
action;
or does one point to the brain, whose action is
the thought?
Which is the illusion, the thought which exists
solely in the action of the brain;
or the brain whose action constitutes the thought?
It requires no profound satori to realize that
values are artifacts of the mind
and as such have no "real" existence which can
be directly experienced.
The basic problem is to distinguish clearly between
direct experience
and imposed values which masquerade as "real"
objects.
"Soul" is a value; "spirit" is a value; "truth"
is a value; "omniscience" is a value;
"mystery" is a value; "power" is a value, "karma"
is a value, ad infinitum.
Abstractions reified are not matters which can
be experienced directly.
In short, it is the abstraction which is the illusion.
There is no "ultimate truth" or "transcendental
mystery of Being"
which can be experienced directly, because there
is no "real experience"
other than direct experience. The mind cannot
know
that which it cannot experience; and it cannot
directly experience
anything but the input of the senses.
There is nothing in the mind which the mind can
grasp;
and likewise nothing outside the mind which the
mind can grasp.
If my mind cannot transcend itself, then it is
clear that knowledge
of "transcendent" knowledge is an illusory quest
whose only purpose
is to "get one-up" on an ego, which is itself
an illusion
made up of sensory images stored in my memory.
This is samsara, and I will have no more of it.
Index of Verses